Optimize your solar plant design. Evaluate its energy yield and financial returns.
Solar farm design and feasibility software for utility-scale PV and PV+BESS design. Search layouts by levelized cost of energy, automate string-to-inverter assignment and follow one design through to P50/P90, CFADS and the debt it supports, in the browser. Estimates under your assumptions.
What a solar feasibility study software has to carry
One design, from the site boundary to the financing case, with every input traceable. The same capabilities on every plan. Results are estimates under your assumptions, and task automation does not replace engineering review.
Utility-scale modeling in the browser
Define geometry, modules, inverters and losses, and simulate production with nothing to install. No Windows licence and no workstation.
Monte Carlo P50/P90
Thousands of iterations to quantify solar resource and production uncertainty with statistical rigor and a stated uncertainty band.
Project report in one click
Export the study documentation: P50/P90, CFADS and DSCR analysis, loss tree, sensitivities and executive summary. No manual assembly.
Search the layout by levelized cost of energy
Declare the objective and let the search explore pitch, GCR and configuration, instead of enumerating candidates by hand. The optimiser's LCOE is a preliminary estimate; the full energy and economic case is recomputed afterwards, and that is the number to review.
P50/P90 with statistical rigor
Thousands of iterations to quantify resource and production uncertainty. A P50/P90 that states its uncertainty band.
From model to the study report in one click
Export the study documentation: P50/P90, CFADS and DSCR analysis, loss tree, sensitivities and executive summary. No manual assembly.
Prefer to see the whole thing in one go?
A guided tour through the complete workflow, from the plant model to the exported report.
Watch the walkthroughA methodology validated against industry references
Heliosolve's engine is validated against NREL, Sandia/PVPMC and a production benchmark (JUST 5 MWp case), and against measured production at the NIST Ground Array: −1.1% on annual energy against 371 MWh measured, on one plant of 1,152 modules and with no site calibration. Every report states its protocol, its result and its limits, and can be reproduced.
- Validated vs. NREL BEST bifacial
- Validated vs. Sandia / PVPMC
- Production benchmark — JUST 5 MWp case
On the way
This capability is in development and is not part of the current beta.
Model vs. SCADA comparison
Import real production data and automatically compare it to the simulated model to identify deviations and optimize operations.
See it run on a project
One task, your site, and a straight answer about where we do not fit.
Request a session with an engineer